It is always a sad day when a significant children’s
literature author passes, and this week was a sad one when we said good-bye to
Nelle Harper Lee. Going under the penname of Harper Lee, she will always be
remembered as an American author who wrote one of the most recognized titles in
the United States and showed the world what living in the South was like.
Of course made famous by her Pulitzer–Prize-winning book To Kill A Mockingbird, Lee is an influential author who taught us about
racial inequality and injustice during our grade-school years—the book is still
widely part of the American elementary education curriculum. Since its
publication, the book has been translated in 40 languages and continues to sell
in record numbers.
But what about this novel read by a young audience makes it
so profound? One scholar Gregory Jay states: “The consensus interpretation of
the novel, generally confirmed by how it has been taught in schools, focuses on
the moral lesson of empathy as the cardinal virtue and urgent program of racial
liberalism”—but that is not all. Jay states that not only is this novel a
prevalent didactic tool of antiracist morality, but “Recently, this consensus
has been interrupted by critical analyses of ‘sexual otherness’ in the novel
and its many sly ways of subverting gender normativity.” He comments that
perhaps there is more behind the stereotyped portal of blacks, and
objectification of their subjectivity demonstrates another command of the white,
heteronormative, dominant culture that comes from looking at the
“destabilization of heterosexuality,” a close reading that looks beyond the
more common anti-racist campaign.
Also, as seen in Graeme Dunphy’s article “Meena's
Mockingbird: From Harper Lee to Meera Syal,” post-colonial reading of Lee’s
works have allowed new books that deal with childhood experiences surrounding
racism, such as Anita and Me, the opportunity to show a way of
overcoming obstacles of oppression through its narrative. Dunphy connects the
titles stating, “The world is seen through the eyes of a young girl as she is
growing up, and the strength of both authors is the skill with which they
parody their respective juvenile vernaculars” (643). Dunphy turns our attention, as readers, to the innocence and naivety presented within a youthful and inexperienced
narrator’s perspective. This allows each book to present the reader with harsh
sociological challenges that, through the eyes of a child, suggest the irony of
how books can teach diversity and respect for all through such a perspective—a demonstration of childhood
innocence as a segue into the harsh realities of society.
And while there are many interesting ways to look and talk
about Lee’s historic and influential work, the fact remains that there is a
sense of timelessness that one finds with To
Kill A Mockingbird and the lessons on empathy that it attempts to promote.
So maybe not all didactic texts are taking away from the childhood experience,
because what Harper Lee’s work does is expose childhood innocence as a way of
productively working through social issues and pushing for positive and
open-minded outlooks into future generations.
Notes:
Dunphy, Graeme.
"Meena's Mockingbird: From Harper Lee to Meera Syal." Neophilologus, 88.4 (2004): 637-659.
Gregory, Jay.
“Queer Children and Representative Men:
Harper Lee, Racial Liberalism, and the Dilemma of To Kill a Mockingbird”.
American Literary History. 2015. 27: 487-522.
No comments:
Post a Comment