As
many of you probably already know (and if not this will be quite a surprise),
the Grimm Brothers were the authors of many well-known folktales past down over
generations. Many of these tales have been adapted into sweet movies of lovely
princesses and songs that provoke nostalgic memories. The original published
stories, however, were nothing like this. They were, dark and twisted, filled
with scenarios of murder, greed, lust, death, and even rape. Silly to think those stories adapted by
Disney are so precious, right?
In
a recent article for the Irish Times,Jack Zipes (acclaimed author of several books discussing fairy tales in society today such
as Breaking the Magic Spell: Radical Theoriesof Folk and Fairy Tales and Why FairyTales Stick: The Evolution and Relevance of a Genre), talks about the
contradictions and distortions these modern versions hold. He points out how
there are dark images and descriptions in the original publications and how
these new versions are probably opposite to the intentions of the Grimm Brothers original publications. He emphasizes that the original published fairy tales were not
originally meant for a child audience and also never intended to become great
works of children’s literature. Interestingly, the stories originated from European, Middle Eastern, and Asian tales passed down
orally over generations and most of the stories did not even contain
fairies.
Zipes
states, “Clearly, if [the Grimm Brothers] were
living today, they would be shocked to discover how their tales have been
misread and hyped and spread throughout the world in all sizes and shapes, not
to mention in films and TV programs that might make them shudder.”
From Rapunzel |
To clarify just how different these versions of the fairy tales
are, here are two examples:
In the Grimm’s version of Rapunzel, a husband steals from the
garden of a witch to satisfy his pregnant wife’s brutal pregnancy cravings.
When the husband is caught stealing ‘rampion’ from the garden, he is forced to
give the witch his daughter, who then grows into the most beautiful girl with
long golden hair. The witch locks her in a tower on her twelfth birthday that
has neither stair nor doors. A prince wandering through the forest sees the
witch call to Rapunzel to let down her hair one day and upon her departure mimics the
call to the dame at the top of the tower. They fall in love and the prince impregnates
Rapunzel. The witch finds out and in her anger cuts off Rapunzel’s hair and put
her out into the forest to fend for herself. The next time the prince comes to
visit, the witch pretends to be Rapunzel and ultimately throws him from the
tower, blinding him when he lands face-first in a thorny bush. He wanders
around for years blinded until one day Rapunzel, who has now given birth to
twins, finds him and they are reunited.
This is
exceptionally different from the Disney movie version where Rapunzel starts out as
a princess and the witch is the villain of this version. The prince's character in
the Disney movie is a thief-outlaw and together they defeat the evil witch and
return to the king and queen, who have missed their daughter for eighteen
years. Then once the outlaw-thief gives up his bad ways, he and Rapunzel get
married and live happily-ever-after.
The Grimm’s version of SleepingBeauty is sort of similar to the Disney version, expect for the whole
second part of the story that gets cut out of the movie. After the prince rescues the
princess from her hundred years of sleep, in the story, he does not go and fight an evil
dragon fairy, but instead marries the princess and they have two children. His
mother, the queen, is a terrible evil ogre who is very jealous of the princess
and the children and desires to eat them for her dinner. She demands that the
cook kill and serve them to her. The cook hides them in his house
and instead uses different animal meats to disguise the dinner she thinks she is
having. The queen ends up finding out the trick and as she is preparing to throw the kids
and the princess into a pit with snakes and vipers, the prince arrives just
in time to save the day. Disney probably assumed that mothers wouldn’t be so satisfied with a story that portrays them as an evil ogre. So they simply cut out that ‘unnecessary’ part of the story and included their own ending, which they could gain more
profit from about fifty-five years later by creating a movie version of the villain, Maleficent.
If these original versions have caught your attention, check out
Jack Zipes’s recently published The Original Folk and Fairy Tales of theBrothers Grimm from Princeton University Press. This collection is translated
from the last original edition of the Grimm Brother’s fairy tales and is one that will bring up many hot conversation starters next time someone brings up a Disney movie, song or princess.
Sources and Notes:
- Irish Times article: http://www.irishtimes.com/culture/books/jack-zipes-on-those-saucy-grimms-fairy-tales-your-mother-never-told-you-1.2034660
- Other fun facts: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/11/12/the-real-story-behind-eve_n_4239730.html
- Sleeping Beauty Summary: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sleeping_Beauty
- Rapunzel Summary:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rapunzel
- Jack Zipes's New Book: The Original Folk and Fairy Tales of the Brothers Grimm
Quite a season for fairy tales. Marina Warner has a new book "Once Upon a Time: A Short History of Fairy Tale" and Neil Gaiman has a new "Hansel & Gretel."
ReplyDelete